Right now, you're probably running at least one AI pilot. Maybe two or three. Some of them are producing results that look good in a slide deck. But none of them are scaling. And if you're being honest with yourself, you already know why, because it's the same reason they didn't scale last year either.
A 2025 MIT report found that 95% of enterprises investing in gen AI had challenges getting any good returns. At the same time, 88% of telecom firms say they expected better returns from their AI initiatives, but only 12% of them are building AI engineered products. So the belief in AI is there. The investments are going in. The pilots are running. The only issue is that the results aren't leaving the lab.
Yet another research has something entirely different to share. NVIDIA's State of AI in Telecommunications report found that 28% of telcos are still in pilot phases, which is down from 49% the previous year. It means that there are certain telecommunication businesses that are actually able to use AI the right way. So, let’s figure out what those companies are doing or what you might be lacking in the process that’s keeping you from getting the ROI you want.
The major problem we’re dealing with here is fragmented data, no unified governance, undertrained teams, and legacy infrastructure that was never designed to support enterprise-wide AI. Let’s discuss this in detail.
Telecom networks generate enormous amounts of data. Every call, every handover, every billing event, every fault log, it's all being captured. The problem is where it lives. Network data sits in one system, subscriber data in another, and marketing, operations, and customer service? They all run on different platforms with different definitions of the same metrics.
AI is only as good as your data, but if you feed it with fragmented data, it amplifies it. Then there's the legacy infrastructure problem on top of that. Most telecom networks are not cloud-native and were built on vendor-specific hardware and customer software stacks. These legacy systems are outdated and were never designed for AI integration. And integrating AI with your existing telecom infrastructure can be complex, time-consuming, and quite expensive.
As we discussed, your AI is only as good as the data you feed it. Among all the bad data challenges, bad organizational structure can be just another one to add. And in telecom, the two show up together.
According to Bounteous research, 50% of AI responsibility in telecom still sits with the CIO alone. Only a small portion of firms have cross-functional governance in place. When your AI ownership lives in one department, you disconnect your AI initiatives from the KPIs that matter for your business. For instance, if cost savings is reported in IT and no one’s actually measuring the customer impact or the revenue outcome AI has created, your business case starts to slowly fall apart.
When AI ownership lives in one department, AI initiatives naturally get disconnected from the KPIs that matter to the rest of the business. Cost savings get reported in IT. But nobody can measure the customer impact or the revenue outcome. So the business case slowly falls apart. Hence, you need to unify your AI initiatives under a single governing body or Center of Excellence (CoE) to avoid silos and capture benefits across teams.
This one is underreported. Everyone talks about the technology gaps. Far fewer executives talk about the workforce gap, which is often the reason technology gaps never get resolved.
A Google Cloud and Analysys Mason study found that over 50% of Communication Service Providers (CSPs) cite employee skillsets as a big concern in their AI deployments. And it’s not just about hiring data scientists and AI engineers, but the broader workforce as well.
Training and deploying large-scale AI models requires serious compute power, memory, and bandwidth. These workloads drive increased traffic across data centers and between cloud regions. Due to this, more and more companies are investing in AI data centers and infrastructure. In fact, recently, Oracle laid off over 30,000 jobs to fund AI data centers, at the same time, AT&T announced to invest $250 billion to boot infrastructure in AI.
The problem is that these costs are not being offset by new revenues. No matter what, investing in AI is the need of the hour, the only thing that differentiate winning leaders is that they ensure that their business case is tied to specific, measurable outcomes; otherwise, the costs will just keep piling up.

Despite all of the above, we all know that AI is already making a measurable difference in telecom, in targeted, well-defined areas. And these include:
The telecom operators that are genuinely scaling AI share specific practices. Here's what they're doing.
AI in telecommunications is failing because most organizations are trying to run it on broken foundations. Fragmented data, disconnected ownership, undertrained workforces, and unclear success metrics, you name it.
The majority of AI pilot failures is a reflection of how those pilots have been set up to fail. To lead the next phase of the telecom industry, you’ll need to be the one building the conditions under which AI can actually scale, provide the best ROI on AI investment, and deliver the right business outcomes.
Most organisations that struggle with hybrid AI struggle because they're navigating complex architectural decisions without the right expertise in the room. Entermind helps you design, build, and scale hybrid AI architectures that actually work, across cloud, edge, and on-premise environments, with governance and compliance built in from day one. Basically, an end-to-end AI strategy, the full architectural blueprints that aligns with your business goals, compliance requirements, and operational realities.
Contact Us